Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Washington Post Offers Lobbyists Access To Editorial Staff For $25,000
Ed Schultz Message Board > Message Forums > The Media
the_keeper03
CBS News Report 2 July 2009
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/07/02/...in5129829.shtml
Washington Post Offers To Sell Access To Editorial Staff For $25,000 -250,000$

Video

For $25,000 to $250,000, The Washington Post has offered lobbyists and association executives off-the-record, nonconfrontational access to "those powerful few": Obama administration officials, members of Congress, and - at first - even the paper’s own reporters and editors.

The astonishing offer was detailed in a flier circulated Wednesday to a health care lobbyist, who provided it to a reporter because the lobbyist said he felt it was a conflict for the paper to charge for access to, as the flier says, its “health care reporting and editorial staff."

With the newsroom in an uproar after POLITICO reported the solicitation, Executive Editor Marcus Brauchli said in a staffwide e-mail that the newsroom would not participate in the first of the planned events - a dinner scheduled July 21 at the home of Publisher and Chief Executive Officer Katharine Weymouth.

The offer - which essentially turns a news organization into a facilitator for private lobbyist-official encounters - was a new sign of the lengths to which news organizations will go to find revenue at a time when most newspapers are struggling for survival.

And it's a turn of the times that a lobbyist is scolding The Washington Post for its ethical practices.

"Underwriting Opportunity: An evening with the right people can alter the debate," says the one-page flier. "Underwrite and participate in this intimate and exclusive Washington Post Salon, an off-the-record dinner and discussion at the home of CEO and Publisher Katharine Weymouth. ... Bring your organization’s CEO or executive director literally to the table. Interact with key Obama administration and congressional leaders."

In response to requests for comment, The Post issued a statement that stopped short of canceling the event.

Kris Coratti, communications director of Washington Post Media, a division of The Washington Post Company, said: "The flier circulated this morning came out of a business division for conferences and events, and the newsroom was unaware of such communication. It went out before it was properly vetted, and this draft does not represent what the company’s vision for these dinners are, which is meant to be an independent, policy-oriented event for newsmakers.

"As written, the newsroom could not participate in an event like this. We do believe there is an opportunity to have a conferences and events business, and that The Post should be leading these conversations in Washington, big or small, while maintaining journalistic integrity. The newsroom will participate where appropriate."

Brauchli, the executive editor, was named on the flier as one of the "Hosts and Discussion Leaders."

In an e-mail to the newsroom on Thursday morning labeled "Newsroom Independence," Brauchli wrote: "Colleagues, A flyer was distributed this week offering an 'underwriting opportunity' for a dinner on health-care reform, in which the news department had been asked to participate. The language in the flyer and the description of the event preclude our participation.

"We will not participate in events where promises are made that in exchange for money The Post will offer access to newsroom personnel or will refrain from confrontational questioning. Our independence from advertisers or sponsors is inviolable. There is a long tradition of news organizations hosting conferences and events, and we believe The Post, including the newsroom, can do these things in ways that are consistent with our values."

The flier says: “Spirited? Yes. Confrontational? No. The relaxed setting in the home of Katharine Weymouth assures it. What is guaranteed is a collegial evening, with Obama administration officials, Congress members, business leaders, advocacy leaders and other select minds typicaly on the guest list of 20 or less.

“Offered at $25,000 per sponsor, per Salon. Maximum of two sponsors per Salon. Underwriters’ CEO or Executive Director participates in the discussion. Underwriters appreciatively acknowledged in printed invitations and at the dinner. Annual series sponsorship of 11 Salons offered at $250,000 … Hosts and Discussion Leaders ... Health-care reporting and editorial staff members of The Washington Post ... An exclusive opportunity to participate in the health-care reform debate among the select few who will actually get it done. ... A Washington Post Salon ... July 21, 2009 6:30 p.m. ..."

"Washington Post Salons are extensions of The Washington Post brand of journalistic inquiry into the issues, a unique opportunity for stakeholders to hear and be heard," the flier says. "At the core is a critical topic of our day. Dinner and a volley of ideas unfold in an evening of intelligent, news-driven and off-the-record conversation. ... By bringing together those powerful few in business and policy-making who are forwarding, legislating and reporting on the issues, Washington Post Salons give life to the debate. Be at this nexus of business and policy with your underwriting of Washington Post Salons."

The first "Salon" is titled "Health-Care Reform: Better or Worse for Americans? The reform and funding debate."

Written by Mike Allen
Copyright 2009 POLITICO

Edited to embed video
patw
This is beyond disgusting-- and the newspaper _just_ cut Froomkin loose -- was _that_ a condition required by these "right" people, before these reporter-lobbyist-governmental-corporate "right" people can alter the debate?

I subscribe to the newspaper, and I'm beside myself. I'm not going to cancel it right away -- I was thinking about it. I had been enthusiastic about considering giving two subscriptions for gifts -- then the Froomkin expulsion happened, and now this, beyond sleezy, soul-prostituting thing is offered by the paper.

What the hell is happening to the Washington Post.

Pat
cqsallie
QUOTE (patw @ Jul 5 2009, 12:33 AM) *
This is beyond disgusting-- and the newspaper _just_ cut Froomkin loose -- was _that_ a condition required by these "right" people, before these reporter-lobbyist-governmental-corporate "right" people can alter the debate?

I subscribe to the newspaper, and I'm beside myself. I'm not going to cancel it right away -- I was thinking about it. I had been enthusiastic about considering giving two subscriptions for gifts -- then the Froomkin expulsion happened, and now this, beyond sleezy, soul-prostituting thing is offered by the paper.

What the hell is happening to the Washington Post.

Pat


The offer has been rescinded. As a subscriber to WaPo, I have to sometimes endure apologies and explanations.
Whether or not WaPo will go forward with this is, at best, questionable. Whatever! Now that it's out there in the world of common knowledge - and probably known to everyone who has any connection whatsoever to the internet, WaPo is not going to follow through on this.
It's now just a tempest in a tea-pot
Naturally, I have roused myself to comment. I never expect my comments to make a difference, but something did....
Sallie
lenzy1000
QUOTE (cqsallie @ Jul 5 2009, 12:51 AM) *
The offer has been rescinded. As a subscriber to WaPo, I have to sometimes endure apologies and explanations.
Whether or not WaPo will go forward with this is, at best, questionable. Whatever! Now that it's out there in the world of common knowledge - and probably known to everyone who has any connection whatsoever to the internet, WaPo is not going to follow through on this.
It's now just a tempest in a tea-pot
Naturally, I have roused myself to comment. I never expect my comments to make a difference, but something did....
Sallie


They are scrambling to minimize their PR disaster. Apparently it was a marketing campaign not appproved by the editor.
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ombudsman...lic_relati.html

Big oops
dportjoe
Willing to bet the idea got a hug laugh in the meeting where it was proposed. Only in DC could that idea fly: "Hey Phil Katie over at the arts desk just had this gret idea-tell him go ahed." "Well you guys at the gotv desk keep talking about how much lobbying oney is floating around and I was just thinking we could get some of that scrath to cover the bottom line." " Yeah but lets pimp ourselves up front-what a great joke everyone will know we're just kidding. If they don't we put the money into operaions win/win"
patw
Well, the current owner is no Katherine Graham, and I'm not going to give those gift subscriptions, now. I have also stopped viewing it on-line. Damn them.

Pat
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2009 Invision Power Services, Inc.