Let's be fair now - if the right can impugn Obama's character and challenge his intentions based on past associations; wouldn't it be equal justice to attack Sarah for bestiality? She hangs around with animals up there in Alaska, right? Yah, you betcha! The logic continuum is the same, no?
We don't really know what she does with those woolly creatures before she skins them...black widow?! I'm just saying.............
Full Version: Bestiality
The problem is Obama's shady associtions are well known and provable.
QUOTE(Mole @ Oct 5 2008, 01:33 PM) 
The problem is Obama's shady associtions are well known and provable.
Tell me the shady part Mole...when did Obama plot against the gov?
If it is known, I'd like to know about it before I mail in my early ballot today. You could change the course of history Mole if you can prove to me any improper behavior on the part of Mr. Obama. I will change my vote based upon your proof - but it better be credible and soon as I am going to vote today. Don't equivocate Mole, the country's future is in your hands.
You are derelict in your duty to protect this country, Mole. I am heading to the mail-box in the next half hour...if I don't have credible evidence proving Obama's malevolence, he gets my vote to become president of these Untied States! Only you can prevent forest fires (and Manchurian candidates)!
Waiting, Mole!
Waiting, Mole!
QUOTE(richard maxson @ Oct 5 2008, 11:39 AM)
Tell me the shady part Mole...when did Obama plot against the gov?
If it is known, I'd like to know about it before I mail in my early ballot today. You could change the course of history Mole if you can prove to me any improper behavior on the part of Mr. Obama. I will change my vote based upon your proof - but it better be credible and soon as I am going to vote today. Don't equivocate Mole, the country's future is in your hands.
You are derelict in your duty to protect this country, Mole. I am heading to the mail-box in the next half hour...if I don't have credible evidence proving Obama's malevolence, he gets my vote to become president of these Untied States! Only you can prevent forest fires (and Manchurian candidates)!
Waiting, Mole!
No matter what I say, you will vote for Obama.
Rev. Wright should have been enough, but Obama has a few more "friends".
http://www.washtimes.com/news/2008/jun/08/...-may-haunt-bid/
QUOTE(Mole @ Oct 5 2008, 02:04 PM)
No matter what I say, you will vote for Obama.
Rev. Wright should have been enough, but Obama has a few more "friends".
http://www.washtimes.com/news/2008/jun/08/...-may-haunt-bid/
Let me get this straight...you send me to the Washington Times of Sun Myung Moon origin!?!
He that deems himself the messiah? You're gonna have to do better than that Mole! Time is almost up...............
BTW there is no attribution to the article, is this just so obvious that I don't need to know who wrote it? Or are they afraid to sign their name to slander?
QUOTE(richard maxson @ Oct 5 2008, 12:09 PM)
Let me get this straight...you send me to the Washington Times of Sun Myung Moon origin!?!
He that deems himself the messiah? You're gonna have to do better than that Mole! Time is almost up...............
You have already drank the kool-aid, its too late.
QUOTE(Mole @ Oct 5 2008, 02:14 PM)
You have already drank the kool-aid, its too late.
It is 'drunk' you unlettered polemicist...grammar fails you as does proof-texting. Obama now leads in Colorado by one vote!
QUOTE(Mole @ Oct 5 2008, 10:33 AM)
The problem is Obama's shady associtions are well known and provable.
Really? Are you 100% sure of that. Enlighten us. Don't just suggest something, enlighten us with your mastery Tell us,. in your own words, don't just cut and paste a link. Tell us in your words.. But, be careful what doors you open, they just might hit you in te ass on your way out.
QUOTE(richard maxson @ Oct 5 2008, 12:16 PM)
It is 'drunk' you unlettered polemicist...grammar fails you as does proof-texting. Obama now leads in Colorado by one vote!
I just had a liberal call me an "unlettered polemicist"
Im sure fancy words like "polemicist" make you feel brilliant - all they really do is make you look insecure.
Notice how you now deflect the issue, after Obama's shady associations are brought to light. You immediatley change the subject to a red herring grammatical error, which means we are on to a very effective strategy. We are going to pound Obama on these associations in the tail end of this election. Thank god for the shady Chicago political machine
QUOTE(Mole @ Oct 5 2008, 01:34 PM)
I just had a liberal call me an "unlettered polemicist"
Im sure fancy words like "polemicist" make you feel brilliant - all they really do is make you look insecure.
Notice how you now deflect the issue, after Obama's shady associations are brought to light. You immediatley change the subject to a red herring grammatical error, which means we are on to a very effective strategy. We are going to pound Obama on these associations in the tail end of this election. Thank god for the shady Chicago political machine
Mole, you've got nothin' and you now are starting to realize - I've been right all along, and you guys are going to lose BIG in one month. It's over, Mole. Say buh-bye to conservatism, you will soon be of the past.
And how about Palin being a wealth-redistributing corporation-taxing socialist?
GoU
QUOTE(Mole @ Oct 5 2008, 02:34 PM)
I just had a liberal call me an "unlettered polemicist"
Im sure fancy words like "polemicist" make you feel brilliant - all they really do is make you look insecure.
Notice how you now deflect the issue, after Obama's shady associations are brought to light. You immediatley change the subject to a red herring grammatical error, which means we are on to a very effective strategy. We are going to pound Obama on these associations in the tail end of this election. Thank god for the shady Chicago political machine
I had written 'ignoramus'...but that would not have been appropriate according to board rules so I cleaned it up - note the edit. Don't want to attack you personally, just your 'sources' and proofs.
By the way, care to have a side bet on Colorado this Nov. 4th? Beer? Just like I offered at Eddie's event but you were unwilling to show (or did you come incognito to check on Ed's popularity?)
QUOTE(Mole @ Oct 5 2008, 12:33 PM)
The problem is Obama's shady associtions are well known and provable.
Just as provable as Palin's association with the Alaskan independance party...turnabout is fairplay, isn't it mole.
QUOTE(richard maxson @ Oct 5 2008, 01:12 PM)
By the way, care to have a side bet on Colorado this Nov. 4th? Beer? Just like I offered at Eddie's event but you were unwilling to show (or did you come incognito to check on Ed's popularity?)
I think Obama is going to win Colorado as well.
I didn't go to Big Eddies thng because Im allergic to liberals.
QUOTE(A.HusseinLaverdure @ Oct 5 2008, 02:00 PM)
Just as provable as Palin's association with the Alaskan independance party...turnabout is fairplay, isn't it mole.
Obama's shady Chicago side is more provable.
QUOTE(Mole @ Oct 5 2008, 03:47 PM)
Obama's shady Chicago side is more provable.
Oh Yeah? Prove it!
I had a little trouble following this thread, but I guess the gist of it is that Mole claims Obama is not actually the Messiah because Reverend Moon already is. That right?
QUOTE(dimbear @ Oct 5 2008, 10:31 PM)
I had a little trouble following this thread, but I guess the gist of it is that Mole claims Obama is not actually the Messiah because Reverend Moon already is. That right?
In a nutshell!
QUOTE(richard maxson @ Oct 5 2008, 12:23 PM)
Let's be fair now - if the right can impugn Obama's character and challenge his intentions based on past associations; wouldn't it be equal justice to attack Sarah for bestiality? She hangs around with animals up there in Alaska, right? Yah, you betcha! The logic continuum is the same, no?
We don't really know what she does with those woolly creatures before she skins them...black widow?! I'm just saying.............
We don't really know what she does with those woolly creatures before she skins them...black widow?! I'm just saying.............
QUOTE(Mole @ Oct 5 2008, 11:04 AM)
No matter what I say, you will vote for Obama.
Rev. Wright should have been enough, but Obama has a few more "friends".
http://www.washtimes.com/news/2008/jun/08/...-may-haunt-bid/
Your source is the Moonie Times?
That rag isn't even fit to be used as TP in the outhouse.http://edschultz.invisionzone.com/index.ph...mp;#entry293864
QUOTE(richard maxson @ Oct 5 2008, 12:23 PM)
Let's be fair now - if the right can impugn Obama's character and challenge his intentions based on past associations; wouldn't it be equal justice to attack Sarah for bestiality? She hangs around with animals up there in Alaska, right? Yah, you betcha! The logic continuum is the same, no?
We don't really know what she does with those woolly creatures before she skins them...black widow?! I'm just saying.............
By this kind of logic, we should also wonder if Obama and Wright were secret lovers.
QUOTE(boullan @ Oct 5 2008, 11:32 PM)
By this kind of logic, we should also wonder if Obama and Wright were secret lovers.
And now that Palin and McCain are associates err, running 'mates' - does that make McCain or Palin the playmate? Don't you just love this sort of smear logic? Goose gander stuff...no?
QUOTE(boullan @ Oct 5 2008, 08:32 PM)
By this kind of logic, we should also wonder if Obama and Wright were secret lovers.
QUOTE(boullan @ Oct 5 2008, 10:32 PM)
By this kind of logic, we should also wonder if Obama and Wright were secret lovers.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.