Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: MSNBC Drops Olbermann, Matthews as News Anchors
Ed Schultz Message Board > Message Forums > The Media
Hughie
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/conte...0800008_pf.html

QUOTE
MSNBC is removing Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews as the anchors of live political events, bowing to growing criticism that they are too opinionated to be seen as neutral in the heat of the presidential campaign.

David Gregory, the NBC newsman and White House correspondent who also hosts a program on MSNBC, will take over during such events as this fall's presidential and vice presidential debates and election night.


Nice to see the the general public gets it.


Mutt
How do you shut down the truth? When you are in control of the media,you control what is said to the masses,and if the real truth is something that you fear,then eliminate it. Enjoy the necon "facts" as they want you to know them,they should go good with the koolaid you get from Rush and Slanthead. Of course a police state and prison society is what the righties crave "to keep them safe from the faux boogy man created by those there cheer for",they are just not bright enough to see that ,and if they do,not smart enough to believe it.

Himmler would be proud.....

mutt blink.gif
Hughie
QUOTE(Mutt @ Sep 8 2008, 09:45 AM) *

How do you shut down the truth? When you are in control of the media,you control what is said to the masses,and if the real truth is something that you fear,then eliminate it. Enjoy the necon "facts" as they want you to know them,they should go good with the koolaid you get from Rush and Slanthead. Of course a police state and prison society is what the righties crave "to keep them safe from the faux boogy man created by those there cheer for",they are just not bright enough to see that ,and if they do,not smart enough to believe it.

Himmler would be proud.....

mutt blink.gif


I wouldn't want to see Limbaugh or Hannity anchoring these events either. The most reasonable of anchors for these events has passed and that was Tim Russert, IMO.
IliseHusseinD
blink.gif Seems to me that ever since the death of Tim Russert, NBC has been at a loss as to what to do with their political coverage. they are getting quite schizophrenic with this coverage. They are not well-grounded, and are taking themselves far too serious. Matthews and Olbermann together, was enormous fun, while giving to the point commentary. Consider the way Faux News is so serious about their "fair and balanced" coverage!!! rolleyes.gif MSNBC is destined to be at the bottom of the heap for a long time to come after this. Thank goodness we still have dear Rachel Maddow, to break the monotony.
queteimporta
Don't forget that NBC is owned by General Electric, a major defense contractor. There is no liberal media. It is a corporate media, and the corporate interests will always be served. The people be damned.
Mole
Olbermann and Matthews have no objectivity, and nobody watches them, thats why they were canned. There is no conspiracy.
Bird
QUOTE(Mole @ Sep 8 2008, 10:05 AM) *

Olbermann and Matthews have no objectivity, and nobody watches them, thats why they were canned. There is no conspiracy.

read the reason mole, they were judged to be too opinionated. there viewership was not an issue. since corporatism is most concerned with maintaining control of the media this is not unexpected. as for a conspiracy, yes there is but not in the way generally construed. it is profit driven as well as access driven.
kennethjkranz
QUOTE(queteimporta @ Sep 8 2008, 08:40 AM) *

Don't forget that NBC is owned by General Electric, a major defense contractor. There is no liberal media. It is a corporate media, and the corporate interests will always be served. The people be damned.


Its all those granola eating, pot smoking, sandal wearing, pro-choice liberals on the board of directors!
ëonwë hussëin manwë
QUOTE(IliseHusseinD @ Sep 8 2008, 08:56 AM) *

blink.gif Seems to me that ever since the death of Tim Russert, NBC has been at a loss as to what to do with their political coverage. they are getting quite schizophrenic with this coverage. They are not well-grounded, and are taking themselves far too serious. Matthews and Olbermann together, was enormous fun, while giving to the point commentary. Consider the way Faux News is so serious about their "fair and balanced" coverage!!! rolleyes.gif MSNBC is destined to be at the bottom of the heap for a long time to come after this. Thank goodness we still have dear Rachel Maddow, to break the monotony.
I didn't see it that way. Olbermann, Schuster and Maddow are the only ones fighting the bias exhibited by Matthews, Scarborough and various "contributors". Matthews and Scarborough are biased against Obama, first grudgingly favorable to Sen. Clinton and now favorable toward McShame.


Personally I was glad to hear Olbermann call out Matthews and Scarborough. IMO David Schuster, with his scratchy voice, is the most unbiased on NBC Universe.

David Gregory is biased too, a Chris Matthews lite. As long as NBC keeps the same lame News team of Gregory, Brokaw, Williams, Andrea Mitchell, Buchanan, the O'Donnells it will lose ratings. If we're not watching them on broadcast what makes TV execs think we'll watch on cable? NBC would do better letting Mary Carillo do the nightly new.
Mole
QUOTE(Bird @ Sep 8 2008, 09:14 AM) *

read the reason mole, they were judged to be too opinionated. there viewership was not an issue. since corporatism is most concerned with maintaining control of the media this is not unexpected. as for a conspiracy, yes there is but not in the way generally construed. it is profit driven as well as access driven.


They have no objectivity and they came in dead last in the ratings during the conventions.
Mutt
QUOTE(Mole @ Sep 8 2008, 02:28 PM) *

They have no objectivity and they came in dead last in the ratings during the conventions.



Really,funny but I don't see anything to substantiate what you just said here....hmmm...imagine that.

mutt blink.gif
Mole
QUOTE(Mutt @ Sep 8 2008, 01:35 PM) *

Really,funny but I don't see anything to substantiate what you just said here....hmmm...imagine that.

mutt blink.gif


Why would you challenge me to something so easily provable??? laugh.gif

QUOTE
it (MSNBC) remained in last place among the broadcast and cable news networks.


QUOTE
MSNBC insisted that Mr. Olbermann knew the difference between news and commentary.

But in the past two weeks, that line has been blurred. On the final night of the Republican convention, after MSNBC televised the party’s video “tribute to the victims of 9/11,” including graphic footage of the World Trade Center attacks, Mr. Olbermann abruptly took off his journalistic hat.





http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/08/business...ml?ref=politics
bluecollarHusseinman
QUOTE(Mole @ Sep 8 2008, 02:28 PM) *

They have no objectivity and they came in dead last in the ratings during the conventions.


Who gives a f**k what you think? The bitter cling-ons have no relevance.
Mole
QUOTE(bluecollarHusseinman @ Sep 8 2008, 04:47 PM) *

Who gives a f**k what you think?


Who? Anyone who responds to my posts, thats who.
devorah
QUOTE(ëonwë hussëin manwë @ Sep 8 2008, 02:35 PM) *


David Gregory is biased too, a Chris Matthews lite. As long as NBC keeps the same lame News team of Gregory, Brokaw, Williams, Andrea Mitchell, Buchanan, the O'Donnells it will lose ratings.


What's bizarre about all of this is that David Gregory is friends with Karl Rove, Andrea Mitchell is married to a rightie (former Fed chair Alan Greenspan), Chuck Todd's wife works for McCain, and everyone knows that Brian Williams leans right in his politics, as does the more vocally right wing Joe Scarborough.. yet nobody says MSNBC is a bunch of righties. So, two lefties is bad, 5 righties is good????? scratchhead.gif
mrpoparue
QUOTE(Mole @ Sep 8 2008, 03:54 PM) *

Who? Anyone who responds to my posts, thats who.

Anger and hate are all acceptable traits for some liberals here, because They hate Bush and believe that marxism and socialism are the only way to make the poor and those that dont want to work happy. As well as making themselves FEEL GOOD!!!!
DrX
The republicans are playing chess ...the rest are playing checkers.
kinggarbear
QUOTE(kennethjkranz @ Sep 8 2008, 09:32 AM) *

Its all those granola eating, pot smoking, sandal wearing, pro-choice liberals on the board of directors!

It is worse than that!!! They are really messed up…

They are pot eating, sandal smoking, and granola wearing, pro-board liberals on the choice of directors! Or maybe it is the THC talking. laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif
ëonwë hussëin manwë
QUOTE(mrpoparue @ Sep 8 2008, 07:00 PM) *

Anger and hate are all acceptable traits for some liberals here, because They hate Bush and believe that marxism and socialism are the only way to make the poor and those that dont want to work happy. As well as making themselves FEEL GOOD!!!!
You're damned right we do.

You phony baloney a--kissing nitwits are sending US troops all over the world in BS wars, you talk with forked tongues BS about bad Socialism, Communism and now Islam, Russia, China, Iraq, Iran are kicking your ridiculous capitalist a-- financially. Communist China with its Socialist government manufactures all computer chips used in the word, manufactures half the products in the world and still has enough money to buy oil from Islamic and Balkan nations without going to war.

Socialism kicks the crap out capitalism every time.

Instead of RW j/o praying for rain on Obama's parade they should pray for brains.
Mac McFadden
Olbermann was right, the 9-11 video was inappropriate.
Others thought so too, but Keith was the only one with enough balls to say so out loud.
(And that's why Murdoch hates him)


Mac
BluesOutbackHusssein
QUOTE(mrpoparue @ Sep 8 2008, 07:00 PM) *

Anger and hate are all acceptable traits for some liberals here, because They hate Bush

and believe that marxism and socialism are the only way to make the poor and those that dont want to work happy. As well as making themselves FEEL GOOD!!!!

Mr Pop, your inner irrational loathing is showing.

"Anger & hate" - you want this board sanitized?
Anyone not angry at Bush for at least SOMETHING - is delusional.

You want an "honest" politician in another thread just this past day or so...
and you don't hold the ones who have messed up MOST to any standard!!!!

"They are all the same" works as cover for the very worst behavior.
It doesn't necessarily reward good behavior, because that's boring. And it gives a pass to real crooks.
Its lazy of you.

What kind of crap are you shoveling in the last part of your post.
Its really, really juvenile & stupid to think what you say above. And you are a teacher???

The clueless should perhaps find another occupation!
quiscustodiet
QUOTE(ëonwë hussëin manwë @ Sep 8 2008, 02:35 PM) *

I didn't see it that way. Olbermann, Schuster and Maddow are the only ones fighting the bias exhibited by Matthews, Scarborough and various "contributors". Matthews and Scarborough are biased against Obama, first grudgingly favorable to Sen. Clinton and now favorable toward McShame.
Personally I was glad to hear Olbermann call out Matthews and Scarborough. IMO David Schuster, with his scratchy voice, is the most unbiased on NBC Universe.

David Gregory is biased too, a Chris Matthews lite. As long as NBC keeps the same lame News team of Gregory, Brokaw, Williams, Andrea Mitchell, Buchanan, the O'Donnells it will lose ratings. If we're not watching them on broadcast what makes TV execs think we'll watch on cable? NBC would do better letting Mary Carillo do the nightly new.


I don't know what planet you live on But Mathews has on many occasions has talked at length at how Obama inspires him, he even went so far to say it sent chills up his leg when he does speeches.

Mathews is a clearly in Obama camp
Mutt
QUOTE(mrpoparue @ Sep 8 2008, 07:00 PM) *

Anger and hate are all acceptable traits for some liberals here, because They hate Bush and believe that marxism and socialism are the only way to make the poor and those that dont want to work happy. As well as making themselves FEEL GOOD!!!!



Hey Pop and the rest of you righties,how about we adopt this,as it should and would make all of you righties as well as your cheerleaders estatic;

1.) We eliminate all help for the poor. None,zip zero. That will put more money in your pocket. Let them starve to death or freeze to death,they are useless anyway so let them die off.

2.) And since the economy is going so great,those that can't find or land a job,touch sh*t,they too can starve and die off. And this will put more money in your pocket.

3.) If you can't afford health insurance,oh well,you too can go off and die. This too puts more money in your pocket.

4.) As for those poor countries that have suffered natural disasters,screw'em. Those there can die off too,that way us elite can come in and take over using the money that we have in our pocket by not having to help them.

5.) Eliminate any and all substance abuse programs,i.e. alcohol abuse programs,let those people have at it since it will either kill them off due to accidents or alcohol poisoning or it will put money in your pocket via your investments in the private prison system. Hey, a double bonus here.

Did I leave anything out Pop or any of you other righties here? If so feel free to add anything I missed that would also add more money in your pocket and eliminate what you consider worthless eaters.

After all,the name of the game is the race to the bottom line,either in the corporate world or the personal world,and what better way to do it than just get rid of all those pesky programs that help human beings in one way or another but take a few dollars out of your pocket to do so.

And no I am not being sarcastic here,read his post and think.

mutt mad.gif mad.gif mad.gif mad.gif
Bill Carr
Hey Mutt, you forgot a biggie - eliminate Social Security and Medicare - that saves corporate america from having to pay their share of the 7.65 % payroll taxes. Imagine the tax savings! Each and every executive would get huge bonuses because of this.

30 - 40 million senior citizens out on the street starving? Who cares? PROFIT is what is most important!

(BTW - I know some righties who think exactly like this)
Mutt
QUOTE(BillyHussein @ Sep 9 2008, 08:19 AM) *

Hey Mutt, you forgot a biggie - eliminate Social Security and Medicare - that saves corporate america from having to pay their share of the 7.65 % payroll taxes. Imagine the tax savings! Each and every executive would get huge bonuses because of this.

30 - 40 million senior citizens out on the street starving? Who cares? PROFIT is what is most important!

(BTW - I know some righties who think exactly like this)




Thanks Billy,I kinda figured I was forgetting one or two biggies.....How about that Pop and the rest of the right here at the board,look at all the money in your pocket. And hey,it will also make it easier to put your "keep me safe " police state in place. Another double goodie for you.

mutt blink.gif
Bill Carr
Here's a few more - lets eliminate lawyers ability to sue corporations for shoddy/dangerous products, and doctors and hospitals from ANY medical malpractice. After all, big companies would NEVER put out such things in the almighty quest to maximize profits, now would they?

In addition, eliminate ALL regulations, consumer product protections, environmental regulations. Costs too much. After all, corporate america knows what's best for everybody, don't they? THEY know how to take care of us!
Mutt
QUOTE(BillyHussein @ Sep 9 2008, 08:33 AM) *

Here's a few more - lets eliminate lawyers ability to sue corporations for shoddy/dangerous products, and doctors and hospitals from ANY medical malpractice. After all, big companies would NEVER put out such things in the almighty quest to maximize profits, now would they?

In addition, eliminate ALL regulations, consumer product protections, environmental regulations. Costs too much. After all, corporate america knows what's best for everybody, don't they? THEY know how to take care of us!



Well with all these good neocon points posted,it should get the righties and Pop all warm and fuzzy. And for all of this to truely happen would cause them a literal orgasimic rush as they would finally have what they wanted all along,until they found themselves being bit in the ass by their own dream.

mutt blink.gif
ëonwë hussëin manwë
QUOTE(quiscustodiet @ Sep 9 2008, 06:30 AM) *

I don't know what planet you live on But Mathews has on many occasions has talked at length at how Obama inspires him, he even went so far to say it sent chills up his leg when he does speeches.

Mathews is a clearly in Obama camp
I've been watching Matthews for years. Before IA he gushed about Hillary being unstoppable, after IA about the comeback Hillary. Sure he says he admires Obama and says the same about McShame and Palin.
ëonwë hussëin manwë
QUOTE(Mutt @ Sep 9 2008, 08:05 AM) *

Hey Pop and the rest of you righties,how about we adopt this,as it should and would make all of you righties as well as your cheerleaders estatic;

1.) We eliminate all help for the poor. None,zip zero. That will put more money in your pocket. Let them starve to death or freeze to death,they are useless anyway so let them die off.

2.) And since the economy is going so great,those that can't find or land a job,touch sh*t,they too can starve and die off. And this will put more money in your pocket.

3.) If you can't afford health insurance,oh well,you too can go off and die. This too puts more money in your pocket.

4.) As for those poor countries that have suffered natural disasters,screw'em. Those there can die off too,that way us elite can come in and take over using the money that we have in our pocket by not having to help them.

5.) Eliminate any and all substance abuse programs,i.e. alcohol abuse programs,let those people have at it since it will either kill them off due to accidents or alcohol poisoning or it will put money in your pocket via your investments in the private prison system. Hey, a double bonus here.

Did I leave anything out Pop or any of you other righties here? If so feel free to add anything I missed that would also add more money in your pocket and eliminate what you consider worthless eaters.

After all,the name of the game is the race to the bottom line,either in the corporate world or the personal world,and what better way to do it than just get rid of all those pesky programs that help human beings in one way or another but take a few dollars out of your pocket to do so.

And no I am not being sarcastic here,read his post and think.

mutt mad.gif mad.gif mad.gif mad.gif
Yeah that'll happen. Eliminating any of the items you listed would put RW a--holes on the street with the rest of us. Almost all RW lawyers, insurance companies, stock market, banks, churches that prey on the suffering of others or middlemen to the government services will go out of business.
mrpoparue
QUOTE(Mutt @ Sep 9 2008, 05:05 AM) *

Hey Pop and the rest of you righties,how about we adopt this,as it should and would make all of you righties as well as your cheerleaders estatic;

1.) We eliminate all help for the poor. None,zip zero. That will put more money in your pocket. Let them starve to death or freeze to death,they are useless anyway so let them die off.

2.) And since the economy is going so great,those that can't find or land a job,touch sh*t,they too can starve and die off. And this will put more money in your pocket.

3.) If you can't afford health insurance,oh well,you too can go off and die. This too puts more money in your pocket.

4.) As for those poor countries that have suffered natural disasters,screw'em. Those there can die off too,that way us elite can come in and take over using the money that we have in our pocket by not having to help them.

5.) Eliminate any and all substance abuse programs,i.e. alcohol abuse programs,let those people have at it since it will either kill them off due to accidents or alcohol poisoning or it will put money in your pocket via your investments in the private prison system. Hey, a double bonus here.

Did I leave anything out Pop or any of you other righties here? If so feel free to add anything I missed that would also add more money in your pocket and eliminate what you consider worthless eaters.

After all,the name of the game is the race to the bottom line,either in the corporate world or the personal world,and what better way to do it than just get rid of all those pesky programs that help human beings in one way or another but take a few dollars out of your pocket to do so.

And no I am not being sarcastic here,read his post and think.

mutt mad.gif mad.gif mad.gif mad.gif

As usual it is all or nothing for the libs here. We must give the poor everything they need so that they do not need to better themselves or their children. We have health care for the poor now but for some strange reason liberals want to give health insurance to the rich and give the employers huge saving in their workers packages. Poor people DONOT pay taxes now, but thats not good enough for liberals, they want to take money from the evil rich and give it to the poor so that they get a bigger free ride.

Remeber this, NO ONE IS STOPPING YOU FROM GIVING AS MUCH AS YOU WANT OF YOUR INCOME, i JUST DONT WANT YOU TELLING ME HOW MUCH i HAVE TO GIVE.
Mutt
QUOTE(mrpoparue @ Sep 9 2008, 02:28 PM) *

As usual it is all or nothing for the libs here. We must give the poor everything they need so that they do not need to better themselves or their children. We have health care for the poor now but for some strange reason liberals want to give health insurance to the rich and give the employers huge saving in their workers packages. Poor people DONOT pay taxes now, but thats not good enough for liberals, they want to take money from the evil rich and give it to the poor so that they get a bigger free ride.

Remeber this, NO ONE IS STOPPING YOU FROM GIVING AS MUCH AS YOU WANT OF YOUR INCOME, i JUST DONT WANT YOU TELLING ME HOW MUCH i HAVE TO GIVE.



We must give the poor everything they need so that they do not need to better themselves or their children.

With jobs being shipped overseas and being replaced with "would you like fries with that" tell us all Pop just how the poor are going to get out of poverty? Tell us all Pop when the median price of a home is almost $250,000.00 that someone making just barely over minimum wage working 3 part time jobs with no health insurance is going to ever afford a home. Tell us all Pop how someone making less than the poverty level is going to be able to enjoy life? Tell us all Pop the answers you have for these questions.


We have health care for the poor now but for some strange reason liberals want to give health insurance to the rich and give the employers huge saving in their workers packages.

Explain in full what is wrong with universal health care Pop. You say it is for the rich,yet hom many times have you been slapped with the facts that even those making $100K per year are under insured or are facing bankruptcy due to health care cost. Tell us all Pop where the greed of those at the top ends and humanity begins.


Poor people DONOT pay taxes now, but thats not good enough for liberals, they want to take money from the evil rich and give it to the poor so that they get a bigger free ride.

Based on what you have said here Pop,someone who is below or at the poverty line should be taxed to the very bottom,how compassionate of you. So far your reply tells the story Pop,and all those things that I and the others have said you would embrace in a heartbeat,based on this line above . Your compassion makes me sick,as it is nothing more than a talking point and something you try to hang your hat on and point to each time you are confronted and have to admit to those truths that I and others have posted. If compassion was a drink of water,a thimble would be way to big to hold yours,just like the rest of the righties here.


Remeber this, NO ONE IS STOPPING YOU FROM GIVING AS MUCH AS YOU WANT OF YOUR INCOME, i JUST DONT WANT YOU TELLING ME HOW MUCH i HAVE TO GIVE.

No one is telling you what to give Pop,in fact,you can keep all that is yours and don't give one penny. Because for you to do so would go against all that you believe and want. Like I said,if the poor would just die off or go into a slave labor camp and make the rich richer and then just drop dead,you and the rest of the right would be just tickled shitless. If the old and those on a fixed income would just die off,you would be able to feel better about yourself .

And this holds true for all those compassionate rabid righties,if those dirty poor worthless eaters would just drop dead,the only expense that would be incured would be getting rid of the bodies. And hey,who knows,you could work out a mega deal with a crematorium and do it cheap,especially for those made homeless by this current cartel,which is growing. Or if you are an investor of or own a crematorium,there ya go,more money in your pocket. After all,a homeless person made that choice on their own,the current economics and your hero's in the White House and their cronies at the tops of the corporations had nothing to do with it,so let them starve to death or freeze to death,no skin off your nose and no penny out of your pocket,just the way you want it.

mutt mad.gif mad.gif mad.gif mad.gif



mrpoparue
QUOTE(Mutt @ Sep 9 2008, 01:12 PM) *

We must give the poor everything they need so that they do not need to better themselves or their children.

With jobs being shipped overseas and being replaced with "would you like fries with that" tell us all Pop just how the poor are going to get out of poverty? Tell us all Pop when the median price of a home is almost $250,000.00 that someone making just barely over minimum wage working 3 part time jobs with no health insurance is going to ever afford a home. Tell us all Pop how someone making less than the poverty level is going to be able to enjoy life? Tell us all Pop the answers you have for these questions.
We have health care for the poor now but for some strange reason liberals want to give health insurance to the rich and give the employers huge saving in their workers packages.[size=7][font=Tahoma][font=Tahoma] Mutt if the median is 250 than that means there are plenty of house for far less. There are houses in my area that are selling for less than 120 thousand and new ones for 150,000. Please show me in the Constitution where it says that everyone regardless of income is due to own a home. No health insurance with no job? Please give me a list of states that do not have health insurance for those that are on welfare. Please show me a county hospital that does not give free health care to even illegal aliens.

Explain in full what is wrong with universal health care Pop. You say it is for the rich,yet hom many times have you been slapped with the facts that even those making $100K per year are under insured or are facing bankruptcy due to health care cost. Tell us all Pop where the greed of those at the top ends and humanity begins.
[/color]
If a person makes 100,000 a year and is under insured it is that persons choice. I do not fee sorry for a person who decides that a BMW in the drive way is more important than health care.
[b]Poor people DONOT pay taxes now, but thats not good enough for liberals, they want to take money from the evil rich and give it to the poor so that they get a bigger free ride.

Based on what you have said here Pop,someone who is below or at the poverty line should be taxed to the very bottom,how compassionate of you. So far your reply tells the story Pop,and all those things that I and the others have said you would embrace in a heartbeat,based on this line above . Your compassion makes me sick,as it is nothing more than a talking point and something you try to hang your hat on and point to each time you are confronted and have to admit to those truths that I and others have posted. If compassion was a drink of water,a thimble would be way to big to hold yours,just like the rest of the righties here. [color=#FF0000]I never said that they should be taxed I dont believe that they should recieve a additrional check from Obama if they pay no taxes.
Remeber this, NO ONE IS STOPPING YOU FROM GIVING AS MUCH AS YOU WANT OF YOUR INCOME, i JUST DONT WANT YOU TELLING ME HOW MUCH i HAVE TO GIVE.
No one is telling you what to give Pop,in fact,you can keep all that is yours and don't give one penny. Because for you to do so would go against all that you believe and want. Like I said,if the poor would just die off or go into a slave labor camp and make the rich richer and then just drop dead,you and the rest of the right would be just tickled shitless. If the old and those on a fixed income would just die off,you would be able to feel better about yourself .[u]Actually All of the liberals that want so called universal health care free money for people that dont pay taxes when they already get free care and earned income credit are just trying to make your self feel less guilty for being sucessfull. I repeat if you want to give more than you and all of the other liberals do now, Go right ahead no one is stopping you, but you only want to give more if everyone else has to give more especially those evil rich.

And this holds true for all those compassionate rabid righties,if those dirty poor worthless eaters would just drop dead,the only expense that would be incured would be getting rid of the bodies. And hey,who knows,you could work out a mega deal with a crematorium and do it cheap,especially for those made homeless by this current cartel,which is growing. Or if you are an investor of or own a crematorium,there ya go,more money in your pocket. After all,a homeless person made that choice on their own,the current economics and your hero's in the White House and their cronies at the tops of the corporations had nothing to do with it,so let them starve to death or freeze to death,no skin off your nose and no penny out of your pocket,[color=#FF0000]just the way you want it.

mutt mad.gif mad.gif mad.gif mad.gif
aleman
QUOTE(Mole @ Sep 8 2008, 11:05 AM) *

Olbermann and Matthews have no objectivity, and nobody watches them, thats why they were canned. There is no conspiracy.

And yet Brit Hume sits in the anchor chair on FoxNews. Talk about a pot calling a kettle black!

They were taken out of the anchor chair because their network is owned by a major defense contractor as was pointed out above.

Do you have any reputable ratings reports to substantiate your claim that nobody wathed Olberman and Matthews doing election coverage? If so I would like to see them. If not, stop posting opinions disgused as facts. mad.gif
aleman
QUOTE(mrpoparue @ Sep 8 2008, 08:00 PM) *

Anger and hate are all acceptable traits for some liberals here, because They hate Bush and believe that marxism and socialism are the only way to make the poor and those that dont want to work happy. As well as making themselves FEEL GOOD!!!!

I would think that a "teacher" would be above such broacd-brush statements, but then again, that's what I get for thinking!
Mutt
Mutt if the median is 250 than that means there are plenty of house for far less. There are houses in my area that are selling for less than 120 thousand and new ones for 150,000.

In case you have been under a rock lately,most financial institutions have tightend up their belts so tight that unless you are nearly perfect you can forget it or get ready to pay a much higher interest rate. As for the prices,it depends on what part of the country you live in and in that part of the country if you want to live in a troubled part of town or not to find the lowest price. As the economy continues to fall to the basement,those troubled areas will expand so those who do not mind drive by shootings or robbery or other nightly activities will find a bargin in those areas.



Please show me in the Constitution where it says that everyone regardless of income is due to own a home.

Nice try at a dodge,but to own your own home has been the American dream,which I know in your mind is only for the rich and privledged or those who believe as you do. Of course with the economy tanking and the neocon coordinated race to the bottom line many will never be able to own their own home,which is okay in your mind ,since they are not rich enough,they are not worthy of such a thing.


No health insurance with no job? Please give me a list of states that do not have health insurance for those that are on welfare. Please show me a county hospital that does not give free health care to even illegal aliens.

The current requirements and hoops that one without insurance must jump through to get health care is the most de-humanizing process yet devised by their fellow man. How many people in you state of California have died on the emergency room floor Pop?

Yeah,we know,just another worthless eater.

There is no such thing as free health care,the taxpayers pick up that bill,and it doesn't make a difference what state you are in. Either the taxpayers pick it up or the cost to those with insurance goes up,but it is not free. So I already know your response to this Pop,so like I said,if those dirty poor people would just die off you and your money will be quite happy with each other.


If a person makes 100,000 a year and is under insured it is that persons choice. I do not fee sorry for a person who decides that a BMW in the drive way is more important than health care.

The insurance companies continue to raise rates to put them out of reach,deliberately. For someone who has his insurance for the most part payed by the taxpayer you have never had to fork out up to $2,000.00 a month for complete coverage insurance. And if you have a pre-existing condition that number will be higher if you can get insurance at all. And most of us here have posted that those who are under insured or lose their homes or have to file bankruptcy due to health care cost do not have a BMW sitting in the driveway. But the only thing you can spit out is issued talking points,talking points issued by those who have unlimited healthcare payed for by you.


I never said that they should be taxed I dont believe that they should recieve a additrional check from Obama if they pay no taxes.

So they should have to decide if they are going to eat or be able to heat their home or be able to get to work without any help on below poverty wages. Like I said and you continue to prove it by your replies,if those dirty poor would just die off my money and I would be very happy.


The rest of my reply you can't even come close to countering,which tells the real truth of you Pop,and all those here can see for themsleves,all they have to do is read. And for those here that have been here for any length of time,all they have to do is recall any of your replies to any threads similar to this one and they will see you for what you truely are,just as clear as day.

mutt mad.gif mad.gif
mrpoparue
QUOTE(aleHusseinman @ Sep 9 2008, 07:50 PM) *

I would think that a "teacher" would be above such broacd-brush statements, but then again, that's what I get for thinking!

Is it just me or am I the only one that thinks if you say SOME it is not a broad brush. NOw if I said must liberals or all liberal here then you would be right but I didnt so I will have to reject your statement.
mrpoparue
QUOTE(Mutt @ Sep 10 2008, 06:59 AM) *

Mutt if the median is 250 than that means there are plenty of house for far less. There are houses in my area that are selling for less than 120 thousand and new ones for 150,000.

In case you have been under a rock lately,most financial institutions have tightend up their belts so tight that unless you are nearly perfect you can forget it or get ready to pay a much higher interest rate. As for the prices,it depends on what part of the country you live in and in that part of the country if you want to live in a troubled part of town or not to find the lowest price. As the economy continues to fall to the basement,those troubled areas will expand so those who do not mind drive by shootings or robbery or other nightly activities will find a bargin in those areas.[/color]If you cant buy a house now than the I guess a person should wait till things get better. Even though that is a burdentoo great for you and other liberals to have to endure.
Please show me in the Constitution where it says that everyone regardless of income is due to own a home.

Nice try at a dodge,but to own your own home has been the American dream,which I know in your mind is only for the rich and privledged or those who believe as you do. Of course with the economy tanking and the neocon coordinated race to the bottom line many will never be able to own their own home,which is okay in your mind ,since they are not rich enough,they are not worthy of such a thing.
No health insurance with no job? Please give me a list of states that do not have health insurance for those that are on welfare. Please show me a county hospital that does not give free health care to even illegal aliens.
So now a dream is part of a liberals view of the constitution.

The current requirements and hoops that one without insurance must jump through to get health care is the most de-humanizing process yet devised by their fellow man. How many people in you state of California have died on the emergency room floor Pop?
Horse manure! I know you think its tragic to have to give another person a piece of plastic that says you are entitled to free health care, I dont

Yeah,we know,just another worthless eater.

There is no such thing as free health care,the taxpayers pick up that bill,and it doesn't make a difference what state you are in. Either the taxpayers pick it up or the cost to those with insurance goes up,but it is not free. So I already know your response to this Pop,so like I said,if those dirty poor people would just die off you and your money will be quite happy with each other.
If a person makes 100,000 a year and is under insured it is that persons choice. I do not fee sorry for a person who decides that a BMW in the drive way is more important than health care.A person that get state health care is getting it for free. I guess you just dont want them to feel bad by them not having private insurance so you want everyone to have there state run health care.

The insurance companies continue to raise rates to put them out of reach,deliberately. For someone who has his insurance for the most part payed by the taxpayer you have never had to fork out up to $2,000.00 a month for complete coverage insurance. And if you have a pre-existing condition that number will be higher if you can get insurance at all. And most of us here have posted that those who are under insured or lose their homes or have to file bankruptcy due to health care cost do not have a BMW sitting in the driveway. But the only thing you can spit out is issued talking points,[color=#3333FF]talking points issued by those who have unlimited healthcare payed for by
you.
These are only talking points to you because they go against your socialistic views on wealth and individual responsability.


I never said that they should be taxed I dont believe that they should recieve a additrional check from Obama if they pay no taxes.

So they should have to decide if they are going to eat or be able to heat their home or be able to get to work without any help on below poverty wages. Like I said and you continue to prove it by your replies,if those dirty poor would just die off my money and I would be very happy.
The rest of my reply you can't even come close to countering,which tells the real truth of you Pop,and all those here can see for themsleves,all they have to do is read. And for those here that have been here for any length of time,all they have to do is recall any of your replies to any threads similar to this one and they will see you for what you truely are,just as clear as day.
[color=#FF0000] What load of bull. As usual if some one doesnt believe like a liberal they want the poor to die and are beneath a liberal in being able to know what is best for everyone. How dare you try to tell me how much money I should have to give to someone else based on the fact that I went to school pick a carrer that is long lasting and worked my ass off for 40 + years to get to the point in life I now am at.

I no one here so far is willing to admit that they dont want to give the poor a dime more that anyone else , they just want everyone that has achieved a desent life to pay alot more so those that havent achieved can have the same lifestyle. Marxism at its finest!!!

mutt mad.gif mad.gif

Mutt
First off,many here are taking notice as to how you are camoflaging your replies Pop,that way they have to fish for them due to the color,and my bet is ,you want them to try and fish and not see them.



If you cant buy a house now than the I guess a person should wait till things get better. Even though that is a burden too great for you and other liberals to have to endure.

Under the neocon plan,home ownership is reserved for the well heeled. Servants of the neocon New WorldOrder do not desrve to own a home since all they are is an expendable asset. And the prices going through the stratosphere and wages dropping are the very real indicators. As of this morning the local TV station did a report of a family who lost their home,they are with their child living in a tent in a local camp ground,all courtesey of Republican/neocon policies and tactics done by this cartel and their corporate cronies. And I am betting that more and more are going to be in the same situation very quickly. But hey,they made the wrong choices so screw'em. With winter coming and homeless shelters already at capacity Pop,you and those like you will get your wish,those who have been screwed by your hero's will run the risk of dying off,just what you think they should do.

You still don't get it do you? The only thing that makes man unequal has been created by man to do just that. You keep on going on with the neocons and your misguided preachers,and you can sit back and think to yourself as many die due to the weather or lack of food just how good the current policies are for you and your pocket book,and how much you have been able to keep for yourself. Because in your mind and the neoconservatives mind,that is all that matters. Me,myself and I.....and your replies to these truths tell the real truth of you,and it isn't the truth you think it is.


So now a dream is part of a liberals view of the constitution

This is nothing but spin and those who read through what is said will see it as nothing but,which tells me and them you cannot face the truth.


Horse manure! I know you think its tragic to have to give another person a piece of plastic that says you are entitled to free health care, I dont

Again, all you offer is spin and dodge. You didn't even read what I said,but I am willing to bet that many here will read what I have said and know that what I said is the real truth,something you cannot face.



If a person makes 100,000 a year and is under insured it is that persons choice. I do not fee sorry for a person who decides that a BMW in the drive way is more important than health care.A person that get state health care is getting it for free. I guess you just dont want them to feel bad by them not having private insurance so you want everyone to have there state run health care.

Again Pop,all you have is spin and garbage. It is apparent that you did not read one word of what I said,and based on a sentence went right to the neocon response book,how pathetic.


These are only talking points to you because they go against your socialistic views on wealth and individual responsability.

Oh this is to good,you ran right to the comeback playbook Pop. Your neocon hero's in Washington have unlimited health care and you are paying for it. How about that Pop.the very folks screwing you and this country right into the ground so they can try to bring about their nightmarish vision inside their pointed heads to reality are forcing you to pay for their unlimited health care,and it doens't matter if they have any type of pre-existing condition. And here is the best part,when they retire from office and are out on the talk circuit or at the golf course,it will still be unlimited and you will still be paying for it,right along with the rest of us. How about you Pop,when you retire are you going to have unlimited health care? My guess is when you retire,you end up picking up the tab in full. I guess only then you will finally see what most of us have tried to teach you,but hey,we are just stupid liberals who don't see the neocon way. Of this I am thankful,because so far,the catastrophy around us is a neocon creation,and quite frankly,many of the people of this country have had enough of the theft and destruction.

mutt mad.gif mad.gif mad.gif mad.gif



This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2008 Invision Power Services, Inc.