Make no mistake about it, race matters in the 2008 Presidential Election. Barack Obama is not only one of the most brilliant politicians that America has ever seen, he directly reflects the comprehensive history of America. He is a man born of a white mother and a African father. Descendants of Africans and white women have been the primary subjects of prejudice in America and Sen. Obama is descendant from both of groups. He epitomizes everything that white America would like to see black America be. As Joe Biden put it, Barack Obama is an "articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy". He has walked through the fires of racism and Clintonism to emerge as the Democratic Party's nominee. The purpose of this forum is to define how and why race is impacting the candidate and pundit behavior, strategies, and choices in the 2008 Presidential Election.
Even though Sen. Obama represents the best of African-America, many whites still have a problem with his "otherness" or to be frank, his blackness. Which means that if ever a black man were "perfect", then he still would not be good enough for them solely on the color of one of the many organs we humans share in common. They claim that they don't know him. They claim that he's a Muslim, when they know that he is not. They claim that Hillary Clinton was somehow wronged during a primary contest in which she handed the opposition a playbook, soundbytes, and video clips with which to bludgeon her Democratic colleague with. Barack Obama in no way shape or form wronged Hillary Clinton and each time they ask one of these PUMA nuts for an example, they simply can not give one. Not one!
I believe that this difficulty to visualize and to actualize a black man in the country's most prestigous position of power is rooted in the truthful origins of our country. It is rooted in white America's romance of the past, which for the rest of us reads like a study in global trauma. The truth is that Barack Obama's father would have been killed in cold blood for sleeping with a white woman were this the wrong time in America. The truth is that Barack Obama's father and mother probably would have never met in the old segregated south. The truth is that were it not for the diversity of the great state of Hawaii, then Barack Obama wouldn't have been able to flourish the way that he did because the rest of America is not as ethnically diverse nor desegregated as Hawaii is. The truth is that the resistance to vote for a black man reflects many white Americans desire to maintain white supremacy and dominance in America both consciously and sub-consciously.
As an African-American, I understand this perfectly. When blacks were surpassed by hispanics as the largest minority in this country, we lost political power and favor and it is highly reflected in this campaign. African-Americans were ready to go to political war with Hispanic-Americans if they stifled Obama's bid on a racial basis. In all honesty, no two groups in America should be more closely bonded then blacks and hispanics. So, I understand that the white man is seeing the racial composition of America change right before their very eyes and I understand that they don't particularly like it.
The historical disposition of whites in America can and may act as a choking point for progress in America. I do not wish to equate Sen. Obama to Jesus. However, African-Americans have always believed that if Jesus appeared today and appeared to be a black man, then most whites in America would surely not be saved. My point is that no matter how good what an African-American offers is, many whites are too struck by fear to accept that they may be helped by the "inferior" black man. Or as one Clinton supporter put it, an "inadequate black man".
Sen. Obama has had to walk the tightrope of race during his campaign and has at times stopped to educate and inform the American people. I ask you, when has a speech such as "A More Perfect Union", which was essentially to sooth over white people's angst about Obama's Pastor, ever been required of any candidate in this country's history? When has a candidate had to consciously place his own racial group's agenda on the back burner to prove that he is for all Americans. No white candidate has ever had to think like that, more or less act on it. No candidate has ever received US Secret Service protection so fast. No white candidate has ever had to prove his religious choice based solely on his name. No white candidate has ever had his own father's middle name used against him in an election as a smear. No candidate has ever suffered the indignity of having his racial authenticity questioned. All of these firsts reflect that America still has a problem with African-Americans as a group, even with one who is half-white.
They do not balk at a black Senator or Congressperson, Judge, Mayor, or Governor, but the Presidency is different. It's the symbol of who we are as a country and for the past 232 years we have been the country of the 43 white men who lead it and not of the whole of this beautifully diverse nation. This is how we perceive ourselves and this is how the rest of the world perceives us, as a white man's country. Sen. Obama has often said that he believe that his election would change the way that the country is viewed around the world. He never got specific about his feelings, but I will attempt to analyze them. White people are a minority on Planet Earth, yet white male dominance has exerted a power grip that has oppressed many non-white nations. The mere fact that Obama is not a white man will allow many of them to let their guard down. This will give our foreign policy a dimension not yet seen and I'm sure that it will lend itself to greater alliance building.
Charles Barkley put it plain and simple. I would only add to what he said by asking the question of whether or not white Americans are ready to do the right thing? Or will they allow their pride and prejudice to send the country down the path of destruction by their refusal to vote for a black man. What do you think they will do?
